As 2025 draws to a close, it’s time to take a breath and look back on a year that reshaped the way we talk about AI, law, and the digital future. From courtrooms to code, the pace of change has been nothing short of electric — and so has the conversation. For me personally, this was a year of firsts: academic milestones, new beginnings, and 40 blog posts later, a clearer vision of where I’m headed. Through ai-legalinsight.com, I’ve tried to make legal tech just a little more human and a little less intimidating. This is my recap of a year full of learning, questions, and momentum.
Personal Recap: A Year of Firsts, Growth, and New Directions
2025 began with a milestone: I completed my First State Examination in January, closing a major chapter in my legal education. But instead of taking a break, I channeled my momentum into something new – building ai-legalinsight.com. Within weeks, the website was live, and by February, I published my very first blog post. What started as a personal side project quickly became a platform for learning, reflection, and connection.
In May, I began my legal traineeship, and alongside the practical demands of the Referendariat, I continued to write and grow the blog. Over the summer, I earned my Data Protection Officer (DPO) certification, deepening my understanding of data governance and compliance frameworks. And in October, I officially started my Master’s degree in Legal Tech — another step into the future of law and innovation.
This year has been one of transition, but also one of clarity. I’ve written and published 40 articles independently, each one sharpening my perspective and pushing me to translate complex topics into approachable insights. And I’ve met some incredible people in the legal tech space – thinkers, builders, and fellow explorers – who’ve inspired me to keep going. If 2025 had a theme, it would be this: learning in public, and loving the process.
ai-legalinsight: Building a Voice in the Legal Tech Conversation
When I launched ai-legalinsight at the start of the year, I had one clear goal: to make complex topics like AI regulation, data protection, and digital law easier to understand – not just for legal professionals, but for anyone curious about how technology is reshaping our legal world. What began as a passion project quickly became a platform that challenged me to dig deeper into ongoing debates, translate legal language into everyday terms, and stay up to date with an industry that never slows down.
Over the course of 2025, I published 40 blog articles – each researched, written, and edited by hand. From deep dives into the EU AI Act and GDPR enforcement, to explorations of dark patterns, data sovereignty, and the global AI race, every piece taught me something new. Some posts sparked meaningful conversations, others pushed me to re-evaluate my own views – but all of them reaffirmed the value of staying curious and consistent.
More than just content creation, the process of writing shaped how I think. With every article, I sharpened not only my legal knowledge but also my ability to critically assess emerging technologies and explain them with clarity. It helped me find my voice in a rapidly evolving field and gave structure to my academic journey – from earning my DPO certification to beginning my Master’s in Legal Tech. ai-legalinsight wasn’t just a blog this year; it became a bridge between learning and doing, between theory and practical insight. And it’s one I plan to keep building on in 2026.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
AI & Legal Tech Recap of 2025
If 2023 was the year of AI hype and 2024 the year of regulatory groundwork, then 2025 will likely be remembered as the year those worlds collided. Legal frameworks finally began catching up with technological capabilities – and in some cases, pushing back. The European Union led the charge with the final adoption of the AI Act, expected to fully enter into force by mid-2026. This regulation, the first of its kind globally, sets out clear obligations for providers and users of high-risk AI systems, demanding transparency, human oversight, and robust risk management. For the legal tech and AI sectors alike, it’s a seismic shift – turning compliance from an afterthought into a strategic priority.
The GDPR also continued to flex its regulatory muscle. Major fines in 2025 reminded everyone that data protection is far from a solved issue. Enforcement focused increasingly on areas where AI and personal data intersect – such as AI-driven decision-making, opaque data scraping practices, and inadequate consent mechanisms. Alongside that, regulators sharpened their focus on dark patterns, targeting manipulative interface designs that undermine user autonomy. From cookie banners to subscription flows, designers were forced to rethink how they obtain and respect user consent.
2025 also brought new complexity: as AI models grew larger and more commercially integrated, the energy demands of training and deployment became harder to ignore. Headlines about electricity shortages, environmental impact, and infrastructure bottlenecks added a new layer to the “AI race.” While companies like OpenAI and Google DeepMind continued pushing technical boundaries, others leaned into alternative infrastructure strategies, including satellite-based data transmission and solar-powered compute. In parallel, legal experts began to ask: how do energy consumption and sustainability factor into the responsible use of AI?
In the legal tech landscape, AI’s influence became more embedded than experimental. Tools for document automation, legal research, compliance tracking, and even contract drafting reached new levels of sophistication – but also scrutiny. Law firms and legal departments found themselves navigating a fine line between efficiency and ethical risk, especially as generative AI systems raised questions about confidentiality, bias, and explainability. The pressure to adopt AI was strong, but so was the expectation to do it responsibly.
Globally, we also saw a growing patchwork of AI governance efforts. The United States continued its sectoral approach, leaning on the AI Risk Management Framework and a handful of state-level initiatives. China expanded enforcement of its Personal Information Protection Law while advancing strict rules on algorithmic recommendation systems. Meanwhile, international organizations tried to steer the global conversation on trustworthy AI, though consensus remained elusive.
What stands out looking back is the increasing interdependence between technology and law. Legal scholars are now part of the innovation cycle. Regulators are becoming more tech-savvy. And AI developers – whether they like it or not – are being held accountable not only by code, but by constitutions, charters, and compliance checklists. 2025 didn’t solve the legal questions of AI, but it clarified just how central they’ve become to its future.
Thank You!
Before closing the book on this year, I want to say thank you — to everyone who took the time to read, share, or reflect on the content I’ve published on ai-legalinsight. Whether you’ve followed along from the beginning or just discovered the blog, your interest and curiosity have been incredibly motivating. Writing about legal tech and AI has taught me a lot, but knowing that these posts have resonated with others made it all the more meaningful. Here’s to more questions, more insights, and more thoughtful conversations in 2026. See you in the new year!
Stay curious, stay informed, and let´s keep exploring the fascinating world of AI together.
This post was written with the help of different AI tools.
